Packaging for Fedora
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
hauk at tildeslash.com
Thu Feb 5 14:01:19 CET 2009
This is a good suggestion and we have dropped release info from the
library name. Can you please check out libzdb from svn, build it and
verify that the library is named as you requested?
Checkout from http://code.google.com/p/libzdb/source/checkout
You need re2c (a scanner) to build from subversion. re2c should be
available in a fedora package otherwise try http://re2c.org/
On 5. feb.. 2009, at 08.50, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Jan-Henrik Haukeland <hauk at tildeslash.com
> > wrote:
>
> On 22. des.. 2008, at 01.14, Bernard Johnson wrote:
>
> > Have you considered generating your sonames to reflect the ABI
> > version of the package rather than tying it to the package version?
>
> Submit a patch
>
> This is what I am using as a workaround:
> http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/soname-version.patch
>
> This generates the shared libraries (for 2.3) in the format
> libzdb.so.5.1.0 rather than libzdb-2.3.so.5.1.0.
>
> I don't know enough about the autotools files to generate a proper
> patch. It's unlikely that I could get this into Fedora without the
> upstream blessing of the library versioning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tildeslash.com/pipermail/libzdb-general/attachments/20090205/bd2eef92/attachment.html
More information about the libzdb-general
mailing list