Connection_lastRowId on postgresql
Paul J Stevens
paul at nfg.nl
Fri May 2 09:35:57 CEST 2008
Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Instead of this workaround, it would be much better if we could change
> Connection_lastRowId() to work with postgresql somehow. Any ideas
> anyone?
>
> And yes, reusing a prepared statement after it returns a result set is
> problematic for SQLite, hence Connection_clear() was exposed. Creating
> a new statement for the result set instead of reusing the prepared one
> should work, but it has not been a big enough nag to refactor.
It's not a big problem for me either - yet. But it does impose a specific
pattern in my code that is not evident at first glance. This is only an
issue during big loops triggering massive amounts of insert queries,
each of which *must* return the lastrowid. But that only affects
throughput, so it's not critical - unlike the mysql bug :-(.
I also noticed you're using the deprecated sqlite3 interface for statements,
right? I'm asking because I'm seeing very undescriptive errors raised by
executing statements in the sqlite code: SQL logic error or missing database.
It looks like all that is needed is replacing sqlite3_prepare with
sqlite3_prepare_v2. I'll do some testing today...
later,
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
More information about the libzdb-general
mailing list